Oroonoko
Oroonoko Aphra Behn
The story of Oroonoko erupts with vivid imagery of the foreign colony of Surinam and immediately takes the reader to another world. The imagery gives the reader a real perspective on what the early colonial Caribbean was like, tie that in with a dramatic love story and you have the formula for a perfect story on early Caribbean trials and tribulations. The story follows African Prince Oroonoko who is a black hero for white men. Behn writes this story from an extremely euro-centric perspective to peak the interest of people in England and the surrounding areas."For the future therefore I must call Oroonoko Cæsar; since by that Name only he was known in our Western World", Oroonoko is given the name Caesar due to his personal resemblance of European royalty. Oroonoko is given the title of "Caesar" due to his blaring similarities to white leaders of great beauty. I believe Behn thought that England wasn't ready for a story of an African hero during the time of systematic racism that the 1600s was. Imoinda is described in a similar fashion to Oroonoko she is essentially a white African love interest for him and just another eurocentric theme in the story.
"Sworn in the Name of a great God; which if he should violate, he must expect eternal Torments in the World to come" Orooonoko stops trusting men of God after being betrayed by the captain of the slave ship. This puts religion in a negative light and seems to a commentary on how people have done evil things in the name of their god. During the colonial early the new world was plagued by men who thought they had a divine right to rape and pillage their way through the Americas. I think the natives and slaves became very cognizant of the atrocities that people committed in the name of god and began to distrust people of faith on this basis. Behn knows this and paints a rather dark image of Christianity especially for a work so heavily targeted at European markets.
"This Prince, such as I have describ’d him, whose Soul and Body were so admirably adorned". Oroonoko is held as an almost ephemeral figure and certainly above his peers. The concept of slavery is built on great inequality in a similar capacity that royalty and power are built on. Oroonoko should theoretically condemn slavery despite selling people into slavery himself, and therefore should also see the flaw in him being held as a prince and a man above other slaves. Oroonoko is arrogant and self-centered in that he would rather be held above other slaves than contribute in their collective freedom. In a strange way Oroonoko has a similar mindset to slave owners themselves and does not appear to be interested in ending slavery as an institution. Oroonoko was an unfortunate victim of slavery but does not necessarily appear to hate it as a practice. This is almost comparable to women against women's suffrage or a soldier against war bonds. Oroonoko's blaring flaws come out in this way in that he is arrogant and holier than thou and does believe that inequality should exist. Oroonoko lived and died on his own terms while at the same time always being subject to someone else.
I also noticed the quick tie-in of a romance in the beginning of the story. I think this was a very European construction of how stories were told, introducing that interpersonal problem to the characters very quickly. It also seems that Behn is trying to lighten your mood before the story turns to tragedy. It is a definite element of duality, with the lighthearted comedy/romance leading to a true tragedy. It's also interesting that the comedy happens mostly in Africa, while the tragedy begins after Oroonoko leaves to go to battle (and is subsequently kidnapped). I think this points to your point about how the struggle between the colonists and the native people comes through. The author seems to be trying to represent the people as happy and more free in Africa, while facing harsh circumstances and punishments when forced to come with the colonists.
ReplyDelete